UK

Rishi Sunak ‘fundamentally’ disagrees with Court of Appeal decision that Rwanda asylum policy is unlawful

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he ‘fundamentally’ disagrees with the Court of Appeal’s ruling that the Government’s Rwanda plan is unlawful (Phil Noble/PA)
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he ‘fundamentally’ disagrees with the Court of Appeal’s ruling that the Government’s Rwanda plan is unlawful (Phil Noble/PA)

The Government will seek permission to appeal a ruling that its plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda are unlawful, as Rishi Sunak said he “fundamentally” disagrees with the decision.

On Thursday, three judges at the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court judgment that previously said the east African nation could be considered a “safe third country”.

The Court of Appeal’s decision was announced by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett during a short hearing in London, where he stressed the court reached its conclusion on the law and took “no view whatever” about the political merits of the policy.

In a statement, the Prime Minister said: “While I respect the court I fundamentally disagree with their conclusions.

“I strongly believe the Rwandan government has provided the assurances necessary to ensure there is no real risk that asylum-seekers relocated under the Rwanda policy would be wrongly returned to third countries – something that the Lord Chief Justice agrees with.

“Rwanda is a safe country. The High Court agreed. The UNHCR have their own refugee scheme for Libyan refugees in Rwanda. We will now seek permission to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court.

“The policy of this government is very simple, it is this country – and your government – who should decide who comes here, not criminal gangs. And I will do whatever is necessary to make that happen.”