Opinion

Alex Kane: Elon Musk, Nigel Farage and the feuds that plague the populist right

X owner’s call for Reform to replace its leader points to possible disintegration of UK’s populist right again

Alex Kane

Alex Kane

Alex Kane is an Irish News columnist and political commentator and a former director of communications for the Ulster Unionist Party.

Nigel Farage and Party treasurer Nick Candy have met Mr Musk in the US (Stuart Mitchell/Reform UK)
Reform leader Nigel Farage and party treasurer Nick Candy meet Elon Musk. The tech trillionaire has since called for Mr Farage to be ousted (Stuart Mitchell/Reform UK/PA)

The populist right struggled for decades to make an electoral breakthrough in the United Kingdom.

There were a few moments – particularly after Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech in April 1968 – when it looked as though a breakthrough was possible.

Indeed, one of the most interesting ‘what if’ moments in post-WW2 history is what would have happened if Powell had formed his own political party in the wake of that speech and challenged the Conservatives?

For a couple of years opinion polls indicated he was the most popular politician in the UK; one of only a handful – the others tended to be on the left – who could be guaranteed to fill a hall just about anywhere in England.

His switch to the UUP after his formal break with the Conservatives shortly before the general election in February 1974 guaranteed him a parliamentary seat, with colleagues; something which couldn’t have been taken for granted had he formed his own party.

Join the Irish News Whatsapp channel
Former Conservative cabinet minister Enoch Powell laughing with his wife Pamela (wearing rosette) and supporters during his election campaign as an United Ulster Unionist candidate for South Down
Former Conservative cabinet minister Enoch Powell with his wife Pamela (wearing rosette) during his election campaign as an United Ulster Unionist candidate for South Down in 1974

Yet, over 50 years later, people on the populist right still refer to him with deference and many social media sites use ‘Enoch Was Right’ memes.

A lot of smaller, well-to-the-right-of-centre parties have come and gone since 1968. A few of them made a bit of noise and some even gained a little traction: but none of them had a charismatic leader and most tended to divide and then keep on dividing until nothing was left.

The other thing working against them was that the Conservative Party was a genuinely ‘big tent’ party; the only party on the right capable of offering a potential political career or role for those who wanted to follow that path.

The game changed when the businessman and politician James Goldsmith formed the Referendum Party in 1994, determined – post-Maastricht Treaty – to give the UK electorate a chance to stop the ‘one way journey to a European superstate in which the UK would be reduced to the status of a mere observer’.

Sir James Goldsmith at his Referendum Party Conference in Brighton
Sir James Goldsmith was leader of the Referendum Party (PA/PA)

He also financed the European Foundation, a Eurosceptic think tank. But he died in 1997, and his party died with him.

That left space for someone to pick up the pieces and that someone was Nigel Farage.

He had been involved in populist politics for a number of years (as a member of the Conservatives from 1978-92 and then the Anti-Federalist League), before joining UKIP in 1993 and then ousting its leader in 1997.

He learned a lot from how Goldsmith ran the Referendum Party, particularly in terms of keeping leadership, membership, policy and media almost entirely under his personal control.

UKIP terrified the Conservatives. It did particularly well in the Euro elections in 2014; so well, in fact, that David Cameron included the promise of a referendum in the party’s 2015 general election manifesto.

Nigel Farage celebrates the referendum vote to leave the EU
Nigel Farage celebrates the referendum vote to leave the EU (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

The rest, as they say, is history. Leave won and the Conservatives imploded. For the next eight years Farage was the one making the weather in UK politics and consolidating his position as the most influential populist politician.

His next goal is an electoral breakthrough in terms of parliamentary seats and the chance - however small it looks right now – of leading a government in 2029.

But for the first time he may face challenges from some who are further to the right than he is.

Elon Musk’s bizarre intervention in support of Tommy Robinson – he seems to regard him as a political prisoner, even though he pleaded guilty to the charges which led him to prison – has created an unexpected problem. Not least the amount of support it seems to have generated for Robinson.

Disorder broke out at a rally at a St George’s Day Parade attended by Tommy Robinson
Tommy Robinson speaking at a rally in London

Musk has now gone further: calling for Reform UK to replace Farage as leader because ‘he’s not up to the job’.

The call seems to have been welcomed by Ben Habib (who had already been given the boot by Farage) and by Reform members who have sympathy with Habib’s view about the need to democratise the party.



It may also mean that funding which Musk had been hinting at will not materialise if Farage stays in post.

What will worry Farage most, though, is whether Musk is determined to drive a wedge between him and Trump. Or, worse still, attempt to steer UK populism away from Farage’s domination and towards something more to Musk’s liking.

Nigel Farage and Nick Candy with Elon Musk at Mar-a-Lago, the Florida home of US President-elect Donald Trump
Nigel Farage and Nick Candy with Elon Musk at Mar-a-Lago, the Florida home of US President-elect Donald Trump (Stuart Mitchell/Reform UK/PA)

And that something might embrace a worldview which seems to be shared by Robinson, Laurence Fox and a ragbag of smaller parties, including some which Farage used and abandoned during his rise.

Maybe, just maybe, the UK’s populist right is about to do what it usually does. Disintegrate.

If you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article and would like to submit a Letter to the Editor to be considered for publication, please click here

Letters to the Editor are invited on any subject. They should be authenticated with a full name, address and a daytime telephone number. Pen names are not allowed.